IS

Zachariadis, Markos

Topic Weight Topic Terms
0.249 critical realism theory case study context affordances activity causal key identifies evolutionary history generative paper
0.225 qualitative methods quantitative approaches approach selection analysis criteria used mixed methodological aspects recent selecting combining
0.127 research information systems science field discipline researchers principles practice core methods area reference relevance conclude
0.116 research study influence effects literature theoretical use understanding theory using impact behavior insights examine influences

Focal Researcher     Coauthors of Focal Researcher (1st degree)     Coauthors of Coauthors (2nd degree)

Note: click on a node to go to a researcher's profile page. Drag a node to reallocate. Number on the edge is the number of co-authorships.

Barrett, Michael 1 Scott, Susan 1
critical realism 1 econometric modeling 1 IS research 1 qualitative and quantitative methods 1
qualitative enquiry 1 retroduction 1

Articles (1)

METHODOLOGICAL IMPLICATIONS OF CRITICAL REALISM FOR MIXED-METHODS RESEARCH. (MIS Quarterly, 2013)
Authors: Abstract:
    Building on recent developments in mixed methods, we discuss the methodological implications of critical realism and explore how these can guide dynamic mixed-methods research design in information systems. Specifically, we examine the core ontological assumptions of CR in order to gain some perspective on key epistemological issues such as causation and validity, and illustrate how these shape our logic of inference in the research process through what is known as retroduction. We demonstrate the value of a CR-led mixed-methods research approach by drawing on a study that examines the impact of ICT adoption in the financial services sector. In doing so, we provide insight into the interplay between qualitative and quantitative methods and the particular value of applying mixed methods guided by CR methodological principles. Our positioning of demi-regularities within the process of retroduction contributes a distinctive development in this regard. We argue that such a research design enables us to better address issues of validity and the development of more robust meta-inferences.